Loner, observer, or agile agent. . .?

I went out for about an hour and mingled with random people. Afterward, I spent time with close friends last night. It was much-needed time with them. I was thinking I wouldn't post anything today because there wasn't much to post about without a date interaction, or one of that sort.

Then I asked my self, what is the nature of interaction between one person and a crowd? One aspect is that you notice things when not in conversation with companions. For example, I overheard a young guy say to some pro-Jesus (should I call them protesters? They had signs about Jesus and how to not go to Hell) that he loved "cock." He didn't yell it very loud, just stated it defiantly. Seeing those social tensions at play is really interesting, the qualitative researcher comes out in me. . . now I feel like I know my city a little better, which is good.

I was also reminded that most people are so caught up with their own concerns that they are "in their heads", so they don't notice you, and don't take note you are alone. Or, they are excited to engage with you because you are alone and not talking with someone else. I had a pleasant discussion at a booth that was set up to promote an upcoming event. It was nice to be able to stop and engage without worrying about staying too long (on account of someone I was with). That kind of agility is only afforded to a person on their own. It is more powerful to be on your own because you can focus and learn what you want to learn, make a difference where you want to make a difference.

After being alone socializing is so much richer because you get that needed feedback - it was so nice to be with friends after that. Once again, life on Earth is all about contrasts. . .duality. . .tension. . .